Sicilian Defense: Myers Attack with a4
Sicilian Defense: Myers Attack, with a4
Definition
The Myers Attack with a4 is a sub-variation of the Sicilian Defense in which White combines the characteristic 5.f3 set–up (reinforcing the pawn on e4 and preparing a kingside build-up) with an early advance of the a-pawn to a4. The move a4 clamps down on Black’s thematic …b7-b5 expansion, fights for space on the queenside, and may prepare the landing of a knight on b5 or a rook lift via a3. The line is named after the inventive American IM and theoretician Hugh Myers (1930-2008), who analyzed and popularized 5.f3 against the Classical Sicilian and suggested the prophylactic a-pawn push in many of his notes.
Typical Move Order
The most common route reaches the variation via the Classical or Najdorf structures:
- 1.e4 c5 2.Nf3 d6 3.d4 cxd4 4.Nxd4 Nf6 5.f3 (Myers Attack proper) 5…a6 6.a4 (our featured move) — ECO code B90.
- 1.e4 c5 2.Nf3 d6 3.d4 cxd4 4.Nxd4 Nf6 5.f3 Nc6 6.c4 e6 7.Nc3 Be7 8.Be3 O-O 9.Qd2 a6 10.a4 — the a-pawn thrust is delayed until Black actually threatens …b5.
Whichever move order White chooses, the key positional idea is that the pawn on a4 denies Black the …b5 break that underpins much of the Sicilian counterplay on the queenside.
Strategic Ideas and Plans
- Queenside Clamp: By fixing the a-pawn on a4, White restrains …b5 and can later aim for a4-a5 to create a weakness on b6 or c6.
- Kingside Expansion: The pawn chain e4–f3 supports Be3–Qd2 and often long-castling, allowing a pawn-storm with g4-g5 or h4-h5.
- Piece Placement: The square b5 becomes a springboard for a knight (Nb5) or bishop (Bb5+ ideas). A rook may swing via a3 toward the kingside (Ra3-Rg3/Rh3).
- Black’s Counter-chances: Without …b5, Black must look for breaks with …d5 or …e5. Accurate timing is critical; if Black fails to strike back quickly the space disadvantage can become chronic.
Historical Background
Hugh Myers first publicized 5.f3 in the 1960s, challenging the dogma that White should develop a piece on move five. The addition of an early a4 was explored in correspondence play during the 1970s. Grandmaster practice climbed in the late 1980s when players such as John Nunn and Garry Kasparov began inserting a4 against the Najdorf and Scheveningen to great effect. Today the idea is a respected weapon at all levels and occurs regularly in rapid and blitz, where limiting Black’s theory-heavy branches is especially valuable.
Illustrative Examples
-
[[Pgn|e4|c5|Nf3|d6|d4|cxd4|Nxd4|Nf6|f3|a6|a4|Nc6|Nc3|e6|Be3|Be7|
Qd2|O-O|O-O-O|Bd7|g4|Rc8|Kb1|arrows|a4a5,b5b4|squares|d4,e4,f3,h7]]
Diagram after 17.Kb1 (Volokitin – Hracek, Pardubice 2001): Black’s queenside play is frozen while White can advance g- and h-pawns.
-
Here Black chose the central break …d5. The pawn on a4 still keeps Black’s queenside in check, showing the dual-wing tension typical of the variation.
Notable Games
- Kasparov vs Akopian, Linares 1995 – Kasparov employed a4 on move 10, squeezed the queenside, and launched a devastating kingside attack.
- Nunn vs Hjartarson, Reykjavik 1987 – One of the early master-level games where …b5 was completely stifled and Black’s queenside pieces never emerged.
Interesting Facts & Anecdotes
-
Hugh Myers is better known for 1…a6?! (the “Myers Defense”) but
considered 5.f3
to be the sane
part of his opening repertoire. - In correspondence databases, the early a-pawn scores a full 5 % higher for White than immediate piece development, underscoring its practical sting.
-
Engines initially disliked a4, thinking it
wastes a tempo
; deeper analysis now shows that preventing …b5 often forces Black into concessions worth far more than a single move.
When to Choose the Myers Attack with a4
Opt for this line if you:
- Enjoy the English-Attack style of play but want to limit Black’s Najdorf theory.
- Prefer strategic clamps and long-term space advantages to immediate tactics.
- Are comfortable playing on opposite wings after long castling.